The precariat – part II & a proposed solution

If you missed Part I or you don’t know what precariat means, you can find that here.

Breaking the Chains of Debt Peonage by Chris Hedges:

Chris Hedges gave this talk Saturday night in Brooklyn at the People’s Recovery Summit.

The corporate state has made it clear there will be no more Occupy encampments. The corporate state is seeking through the persistent harassment of activists and the passage of draconian laws such as Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act—and we will be in court next Wednesday to fight the Obama administration’s appeal of the Southern District Court of New York’s ruling declaring Section 1021 unconstitutional—to shut down all legitimate dissent. The corporate state is counting, most importantly, on its system of debt peonage to keep citizens—especially the 30 million people who make up the working poor—from joining our revolt.

Workers who are unable to meet their debts, who are victimized by constantly rising interest rates that can climb to as high as 30 percent on credit cards, are far more likely to remain submissive and compliant. Debt peonage is and always has been a form of political control. Native Americans, forced by the U.S. government onto tribal agencies, were required to buy their goods, usually on credit, at agency stores. Coal miners in southern West Virginia and Kentucky were paid in scrip by the coal companies and kept in perpetual debt servitude by the company store. African-Americans in the cotton fields in the South were forced to borrow during the agricultural season from their white landlords for their seed and farm equipment, creating a life of perpetual debt. It soon becomes impossible to escape the mounting interest rates that necessitate new borrowing.

Debt peonage is a familiar form of political control. And today it is used by banks and corporate financiers to enslave not only individuals but also cities, municipalities, states and the federal government. As the economist Michael Hudson points out, the steady rise in interest rates, coupled with declining public revenues, has become a way to extract the last bits of capital from citizens as well as government. Once individuals, or states or federal agencies, cannot pay their bills—and for many Americans this often means medical bills—assets are sold to corporations or seized. Public land, property and infrastructure, along with pension plans, are privatized. Individuals are pushed out of their homes and into financial and personal distress.

Debt peonage is a fundamental tool for control. This debt peonage must be broken if we are going to build a mass movement to paralyze systems of corporate power. And the most effective weapon we have to liberate ourselves as well as the 30 million Americans who make up the working poor is a sustained movement to raise the minimum wage nationally to at least $11 an hour. Most of these 30 million low-wage workers are women and people of color. They and their families struggle at a subsistence level and play one lender off another to survive. By raising their wages we raise not only the quality of their lives but we increase their capacity for personal and political power. We break one of the most important shackles used by the corporate state to prevent organized resistance.

Ralph Nader, whom I spoke with on Thursday, has been pushing activists to mobilize around raising the minimum wage. Nader, who knows more about corporate power and has been fighting it longer than any other American, has singled out, I believe, the key to building a broad-based national movement. There is among these underpaid 30 million workers—and some of them are with us tonight—a mounting despair at being unable to meet even the basic requirements to maintain a family. Nader points out that Walmart’s 1 million workers, like most of the 30 million low-wage workers, are making less per hour, adjusted for inflation, than workers made in 1968, although these Walmart workers do the work required of two Walmart workers 40 years ago.

If the federal minimum wage from 1968 were adjusted for inflation it would be $10.50. Instead, although costs and prices have risen sharply, the federal minimum wage remains stuck at $7.25 an hour. It is the lowest of the major industrial countries. Meanwhile, Mike Duke, the CEO of Walmart, makes $11,000 an hour. And he is not alone. These corporate chiefs make this much money because they have been able to keep in place a system by which workers are effectively disempowered, forced to work for substandard wages and denied the possibility through unions or the formal electoral systems of power to defend workers’ rights. This is why corporations lavish these CEOs with obscene salaries. These CEOs are the masters of plantations. And the moment workers rise up and demand justice is the moment the staggering inequality of wealth begins to be reversed.

Being a member of the working poor, as Barbara Ehrenreich chronicles in her important book “Nickel and Dimed,” is “a state of emergency.” It is “acute distress.” It is a daily and weekly lurching from crisis to crisis. The stress, the suffering, the humiliation and the job insecurity means that workers are reduced to doing little more than eating, sleeping—never enough—and working. And, most importantly, they are kept in a constant state of fear. Ehrenreich writes:

When someone works for less pay than she can live on—when, for example, she goes hungry so that you can eat more cheaply and conveniently—then she has made a great sacrifice for you, she has made you a gift of some part of her abilities, her health, and her life. The “working poor,” as they are approvingly termed, are in fact the major philanthropists of our society. They neglect their own children so that the children of others will be cared for; they live in substandard housing so that other homes will be shiny and perfect; they endure privation so that inflation will be low and stock prices high. To be a member of the working poor is to be an anonymous donor, a nameless benefactor, to everyone else.

 

It is time to halt the sacrifice of the working poor. It is time to empower the 30 million low-wage workers—two-thirds of which are employed by large corporations such as Walmart and McDonald’s—to fight back.

Joe Sacco and I spent the last two years in the poorest pockets of the United States, our nation’s sacrifice zones, for our book “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt.” We saw in Pine Ridge, S.D., Camden, N.J.—the poorest and the most dangerous city in the nation—the coalfields of southern West Virginia and the produce fields of Immokalee, Fla., how this brutal system of corporate exploitation works. In these sacrifice zones no one has legal protection. All institutions, from the press to the political class to the judiciary, are wholly owned subsidiaries of the corporate state. And what has been done to those in these sacrifice zones, those places corporations devastated first, is now being done to all of us.

There are no impediments within the electoral process or the formal structures of power to prevent predatory capitalism. We are all being forced to kneel before the dictates of the marketplace. The human cost, the attendant problems of drug and alcohol abuse, the neglect of children, the early deaths—in Pine Ridge the average life expectancy of a male is 48, the lowest in the Western Hemisphere outside of Haiti—is justified by the need to make greater and greater profit. And these costs are now being felt across the nation. The phrase “the consent of the governed” has become a cruel joke. We use a language to describe our systems of governance that no longer correspond to reality. The disconnect between illusion and reality makes us one of the most self-deluded populations on the planet.

The Weimarization of the American working class, and increasingly the middle class, is by design. It is part of a corporate reconfiguration of the national and global economy into a form of neofeudalism. It is about creating a world of masters and serfs, of empowered oligarchic elites and broken disempowered masses. And it is not only our wealth that is taken from us. It is our liberty. The so-called self-regulating market, as the economist Karl Polanyi wrote in “The Great Transformation,” always ends with mafia capitalism and a mafia political system. This system of self-regulation, Polanyi wrote, always leads to “the demolition of society.”

And this is what is happening—the demolition of our society and the demolition of the ecosystem that sustains the human species. In theological terms these corporate forces, driven by the lust for ceaseless expansion and exploitation, are systems of death. They know no limits. They will not stop on their own. And unless we stop them we are as a nation and finally as a species doomed. Polanyi understood the destructive power of unregulated corporate capitalism unleashed upon human society and the ecosystem. He wrote: “In disposing of a man’s labor power the system would, incidentally, dispose of the physical, psychological, and moral entity ‘man’ attached to the tag.”

Polanyi wrote of a society that surrendered to the dictates of the market. “Robbed of the protective covering of cultural institutions, human beings would perish from the effects of social exposure; they would die as victims of acute social dislocation through vice, perversion, crime, and starvation. Nature would be reduced to its elements, neighborhoods and landscapes defiled, rivers polluted, military safety jeopardized, the power to produce food and raw materials destroyed. Finally, the market administration of purchasing power would periodically liquidate business enterprise, for shortages and surfeits of money would prove as disastrous to business as floods and droughts in primitive society. Undoubtedly, labor, land, and money markets are essential to a market economy. But no society could stand the effects of such a system of crude fictions even for the shortest stretch of time unless its human and natural substance as well as its business organizations was protected against the ravages of this satanic mill.”

The global and national economy because of this “satanic mill” continues to deteriorate, and yet, curiously, stock market levels are close to their highs in 2007 before the global financial meltdown. This is because these corporations have been able to suppress wages, slash social programs and bilk the government for staggering sums of money. The Federal Reserve purchases about $85 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities and Treasury bills every month. This means that the Fed is printing endless streams of money to buy up government debt and toxic assets from the banks. The Federal Reserve now owns assets, much of them worthless, of $3.01 trillion. This is triple what it was in 2008.

And while corporations such as Citibank and General Electric loot the Treasury they exact more pounds of flesh in the name of austerity. General Electric, as Nader points out, is a net job exporter. Over the past decade, as Citizens for Tax Justice has documented, GE’s effective federal income tax rate on its $81.2 billion in pretax U.S. profits has been at most 1.8 percent. Because of the way General Electric’s accountants play with tax liabilities the company actually receives money from the Treasury. They have several billion dollars paid to them from the federal government into company bank accounts—and these are not tax refunds. The company, as Nader argues, is a net drain on the Treasury and a net drain on jobs. It violates a host of environmental and criminal laws. And yet Jeffery Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, was appointed to be the chairman of Obama’s Jobs Council. Immelt’s only major contribution to the jobs initiative was to get rid of 37,000 of his employees since 2001. Jim McNerney, president and CEO of Boeing, who also sat on the Jobs Council, has cut over 14,000 jobs since 2008, according to Public Campaign. The only jobs the CEOs on the Jobs Council were concerned with were the ones these CEOs eradicated. The Jobs Council, which Obama disbanded this week, is a microcosm of what is happening within the corridors of power. Corporations increasingly terminate jobs here to hire grossly underpaid workers in India or China while at the same time stealing as much as fast as they can on the way out the door.

As Michael Hudson has pointed out, financialization has created a new kind of class war. The old class warfare took place between workers and bosses. Workers organized to fight for fair wages, better work hours and safety conditions in the workplace as well as adequate pensions and medical benefits. But with a country of debtors and a government that must also borrow to continue operating, Hudson says, we have changed the way class warfare works. Finance, he points out, controls state and federal policy as well as the lives of ordinary workers. It is able to dictate working conditions. The financiers, who insist that cuts be made so governments can repay loans, impose draconian austerity and long-term unemployment to, as Hudson told a Greek newspaper, “drive down wages to a degree that could not occur in the company-by-company clash between industrial employers and their workers.”

The former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, testifying before Congress, was quite open about the role of debt peonage in keeping workers passive. Greenspan pointed out that since 1980 labor productivity has increased by about 83 percent. Yet real wages have stagnated. Greenspan said this was because workers were too burdened with mortgage debts, college loans, auto payments and credit-card debt to risk losing a job. Household debt in the United States is around $13 trillion. This is only $2 trillion less than the country’s total yearly economic output. Greenspan was right. Miss a payment on your credit card and your interest rates jumps to 30 percent. Fail to pay your mortgage and you lose your home. Miss your health insurance payments, which have been spiraling upwards, and if you are seriously ill you go into bankruptcy, as 1 million Americans who get sick do every year. Trash your credit rating and your fragile financial edifice, built on managing debt, collapses. Since most Americans feel, on some level, as Hudson points out, that they are a step or two away from being homeless, they are deeply averse to challenging corporate power. It is not worth the risk. And the corporate state knows it. Absolute power, the philosopher Thomas Hobbes wrote, depends on fear and passivity.

The only way to break this fear and passivity is to organize workers to break the cycle of mounting debt. And the first step to achieving independence from debt—the primary form of political control by the corporate state—is to raise the minimum wage. There are other solutions—forgiving mortgage and student debt, instituting universal health care, establishing a nationwide jobs program to rebuild the country’s Third World infrastructure, and green energy—but none of this will happen until we are able to mount a sustained mass movement that discredits the corporate state. This mass movement will arise, as Nader says, when we mobilize around the minimum wage.

The lowest-grade worker at the General Electric plant that makes high-tech health care devices outside Paterson in Totowa [New Jersey]—a pay grade known as the D 04—was just raised to $14,555 a year. That is under $8 an hour. The plant’s highest-paid hourly employee, known as D 16, earns $22,000. Immelt makes over $11 million a year. This vast disparity in income, and this wage abuse, is played out in every corporation in the country. No one in Washington intends to challenge it.

Only 11.3 percent of workers in this country belong to unions. This is the lowest percentage in 80 years. And nearly all these unions, and especially the AFL-CIO, have been emasculated by corporate power.

Nader is right when he warns that we are not going to be assisted in this effort by established unions. Union leaders are bought off. They are comfortable. They are pulling down at least five times what rank-and-file workers make. Nader says we have to mount protests not only outside the doors of Walmarts and General Electric plants, not only outside congressional offices, but outside the doors of the AFL-CIO. There is no established institution inside or outside government that will help us. They are all broken or complicit. But there are the 30 million working poor who, if we organize to break the system of debt peonage that holds them hostage, may be willing to rise up. We are bound with many chains and shackles. We will have to break them one at a time. But once we rise up, once we are able to threaten the corporate systems that keep us supine through fear, we will unleash a torrent of energy and passion that will confirm the worst nightmares of our corporate overlords.

Related posts:

  1. Notes From Steve Keen on “Lending Reserves” and “Debt Jubilees”; Mish Proposed Starting Point For Real Solution to Debt Crisis
  2. The precariat and the financial oligarchy
  3. Recommended: Michael Hudson: America’s Deceptive 2012 Fiscal Cliff, Part II
  4. Who Destroyed The Middle Class? (Part 2)
  5. Who Destroyed The Middle Class? (Part 1)
  • Johan Meyer

    Some comments.

    First, Haiti’s life expectancy is 61—Pine ridge is well below that.

    Second, What the article says about what is to be done is merely that debt peonage must end. No proposals that I could spot were in the article, for achieving that outcome.

    I had to work two jobs while doing my graduate studies (for which I received a stipend) in order to kill my debt. I.e. no lover, no hobbies, barely any non-study and non-work related reading beyond maybe an hour or so scanning articles. And I didn’t have that much debt to start with.

    Can we get the left on board for a debt jubilee?

    Another proposal is to create propaganda against consumer spending, for the non-working-poor, so that they pay off their debts, and once pushed into the ‘working poor’ category, are less exploitable.

    A third possibility. During the great depression, in South Africa, we had ‘help mekaar’ (help each other) societies in which poor families with a bit of a surplus gave a bit to poor families struggling each month. This way, people don’t loose everything. Keep in mind that the people who participated in these societies largely lived in shanties.

    • Southernfink

      A little while back there was that 12 year old Canadian girl on you tube who could explain how all money is created out of thin air …and becomes debt. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lXE4qStZH0

      Here is Clarke and Dawe for fun….http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAxIiG_ugRw

      • Johan Meyer

        I was wondering about the girl’s presentation, so I digged up the numbers…

        http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/Tax-Revenues-As-GDP-Percentage-%2875-05%29.JPG

        The taxation rate is roughly flat with time, but the debt is relatively consistent as a portion of GDP—thus tying the economic strength to future growth…

        The marginal tax rate has fluctuated on a small scale, but more groups have become subject to taxation:
        http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/136223?uid=3739472&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3737720&uid=4&sid=21101629030003

        • Southernfink

          The majority of people are in debt and only just able to make their repayments which is exactly according to plan , say someone loses their home due to not being able to make their mortgage repayments then the bank can start proceedings to throw them out but end up selling the home to another victim in a never ending debt cycle,just how an economic hit man operates.

          I think you understand economics better than I ever will but recently I came across this and thought it was worth mentioning ,

          From “confessions of an economic hitman” John Perkins writes ,
          In the final analyses, the global empire depends to a large extend of the fact that the US dollar act’s as the standard world currency, and that the USA mint has the right to print those dollars. Thus, we make loans to countries like Equador with the full knowledge that they will never repay them; in fact, we do not want them to honour their debt’s , since the non payment is what gives us our leverage , our pound of flesh. Under normal conditions we would run the risk of eventually decimating our own funds; after all, no creditor can afford too may defaulted loans. However, ours are not normal circumstances. The US prints currency that is not backed by gold. Indeed, it’s not backed by anything other than a general worldwide confidence in our economy and our ability to marshall the resources and the forces of the empire that we have created to support us. The ability to print currency gives us immense power. It means among other things that we can continue to make loans that will never be repaid -and that we ourselves can accumulate huge debt.
          By the beginning of 2003, The USA national debt exceeded a staggering 6 trillion dollars and was projected to reach 7 trillion dollars by before the end of the year- roughtly $24000 for each US citizen. Much of this debt is owed to Asian countries, particularly to Japan and China, who purchase US treasury securities (essentially IOU’s) with funds created trough sales of consumer goods-including electronics , computers, automobiles, appliances , and clothing goods- to the US and the worldwide market.
          As long as the world accept the dollar as it’s standard currency this excessive debt does not pose a serious obstacle to the corporatocracy. However if another currency should come along to replace the dollar and if some the US creditors ( China and Japan, for example )should decide to call in their debts the situation would change drastically. The US would suddenly find itself in a most precarious situation. (John Perkins)
          All money is debt

          • Tha_Gu_Dona_Tapadh_Lait

            Actually, my understanding of economics is quite minimal—I just use algebra to understand it… I read economic hit-man—good book.

            As to the US operation, the other detail is the international trade in US dollars, thus the US pivot against China as it was agreeing with neighbouring countries (including Japan) to trade in a basket of currencies. So as an example, under the Breton Woods system, Japan would say buy something from China, so the Japanese customer would send in the order, and pay in Yen, the Japanese government sends the funds as US dollars to China, and the Chinese merchant is paid in Yuan. Under the proposed alternative, the trade would be done in a basket of currencies. I think there was an asia times article on that, but I cannot remember if it was HCK Liu or P Escobar…

            The other aspect to keep in mind is that the current (fiat US dollar) system is a response to a previous crisis, and that the Chinese, US and Russian governments (and probably others) make careful studies of how to respond to potential crises (i.e. to various outcomes and scenarios), and when a crisis becomes too serious, they try an alternative that they’ve previously prepared. That alternative has various (expected and unexpected) advantages and disadvantages (e.g. in the neoliberal case, causing US deindustrialization, thus putting the US in a precarious situation, yet allowing the US to put its creditors in an uncomfortable position).

            The problem that we (as activists) have is that we have not only a limited understanding of the economics, but also of the basic research tools to test basic explanations and theories. That is why I’m keen to write a mathematical introduction geared in such a direction… Think of it—Perkins’s explanation makes sense, and we can relate to it and use it for basic education, but we cannot prove that this is exactly the US’s current method, nor can we detect when the US’s method changes.

            • Southernfink

              I know this; the MIC is funded by US dollars and the quickest way to stop the funding for this war is to stop trading crude in US dollars.

              Look at some who have tried to switch from trading in US dollars and look what happened to them ,I wrote this yesterday and it seems a shame to only use it once when it appears relevant again today.

              Have you noticed that when Iraq and Libya were invaded ,those nations were trying to get away from trading crude in US currency. And that can be part of the answer.

              In Iraq’s case they had started to trade crude in Euro’s while Gaddaffi was going for gold bullion.

              http://www.dailypaul.com/16594

              Mean while the US currency is one that is simply “printed” without having any gold bullion in the bank. It prints money and then loans it out.

              Is there any gold left and where did it all go?

              Could it be that it went to the Chinese who have been converting US debt into gold and now hold 1054 tonnes of it ,hey that would explain where the German 300 tonnes ended up and why the fed cannot account for it.

              So even the Germans are having trouble trying to get their gold bullion back from the federal reserve and have even been denied to do their audit to check and see if it is all still there ,just for the record they are after quite a bit like 300 tons of it or the capacity of 10 shipping containers .

              Then there is the federal reserve who cannot account for 9 Trillion dollars that has gone missing ,and who could forget Rumsfelt and his missing 2,3 trillion dollars the day before 911 and how convenient all records pertaining to that were destroyed the day after.

              If all nations created money by simply printing it like the US does than the price of gold would sky rocket ,if all nations stopped trading in US dollars it would have to cease it’s GWOT.

    • http://www.byebyedemocracy.org/ kokanee1

      re: First, Haiti’s life expectancy is 61—Pine ridge is well below that.
      Wow! That’s incredibly shameful of us.

      re: No proposals that I could spot were in the article, for achieving that outcome.

      The solution was to raise the minimum wage to $11. Personally, I think a lot more has to be done starting with putting ‘We The People’ in charge of the government and everyone who wants a job can get one.

      re: Can we get the left on board for a debt jubilee?

      Absolutely not! We don’t want any charity from those pricks. All I want is the same rate that the banks get from the Fed: 0% Even with a 0.25% interest rate, $100,000 of student debt is a manageable $250 per year.

      re: “Another proposal is to create propaganda against consumer spending, for the non-working-poor, so that they pay off their debts, and once pushed into the ‘working poor’ category, are less exploitable.”

      Just need a campaign to, “Cut up your credit cards.”

      re: A third possibility. During the great depression, in South Africa, we
      had ‘help mekaar’ (help each other) societies in which poor families
      with a bit of a surplus gave a bit to poor families struggling each
      month. This way, people don’t loose everything. Keep in mind that the
      people who participated in these societies largely lived in shanties.

      Great idea short of changing people’s perceptions about the homeless and the government becoming more proactive in helping the homeless. OWS had a campaign to buy off debt at pennies on the dollar.

      • Johan Meyer

        That last sentence had me thinking. That’s how Britain paid off its WWI and WWII debt to USA (they finished paying in 2006). Perhaps we could revive that…

        • http://www.byebyedemocracy.org/ kokanee1
          • Johan Meyer

            Nice—thanks!

            I didn’t realise that debt is that fraudulent.